I know that I have written something about the greater incidence of 'caste-marks' in Chennai than in many other Indian cities. Even when I did so, I was thinking about single lines on the forehead, either vertically or horizontally, with sandalwood paste, ash or sindoor (vermillion). I must confess that the more elaborate vadakalai and thenkalai marks had completely skipped my mind. They were common many many years ago, but anti-brahmin agitations of the 1960s had led to them being wiped away from thousands of foreheads across the state. In those days, the naamams were a visible reminder of inequities, both real and imagined. The vehemence of the agitations have died down, but their causative factors will never be removed from the society, not as long as there is someone who feels deprived for whatever reason. The naamams didn't make a comeback to their heydays.
So it was a bit of a surprise to see this gentleman at a function on Sunday. More so because the function was not a religious occasion at all. Looking at him for a while, I realized that the naamam was not a one-off sign worn for the function; it seemed to be something that he did up every day, just as he would shave his face or comb his hair. It is his identity, his style, part of who he is. Nothing can take that away from him.
Even these fashions have their phases. Wearing the naamam because it is traditional. Not doing so because it made one a sitting duck. Wearing it with a sense of defiance, a re-assertion of cultural identity. Not doing so because it just takes too long to get the shape of the 'Y' right, hey, who has the time these days!
3 comments:
/* realized that the naamam was not a one-off sign worn for the function; it seemed to be something that he did up every day, just as he would shave his face or comb his hair. It is his identity, his style, part of who he is. Nothing can take that away from him. */
I have found that this is true for most people who *dare* to wear it on their forehead nowadays.
I have asked a few people why they choose to wear it and none of the answers contained "i want to show/advertise my identity". Most said that they thought it was their duty/service to their beliefs. I found that very interesting.
Not relevant to your post but as a side note: I suspect the photographed man is not thengalai variety but more of Balija Naidu type.
Good blog you have here. Anyone who tracks my most favorite city with this kind of diligence has an admirer in me.
Very interesting, especially since I didn't know about these marks in the first place. I admire those people who wear their beliefs where everyone can see them — whether it's cultural or religious. I admit that it could be kind of scary too.
>> Hawkeye>> Glad to see you here! Have been reading your blog off and on - in fact, had linked a post on GN Chetty Road to your blog, about a month ago. Look forward to having you here more often.
Thank you for the nice words!
>> Hilda>> Oh yes, any overt religious symbol seems to be threatening, these days. But almost all of them have very 'inward looking' meanings that we don't take the effort to understand. :(
Post a Comment